Rendered at 15:22:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
ofrzeta 2 minutes ago [-]
I am really torn about this. Sure Microsoft is doing a lot of open source today (.NET core, VS Code and a bit of historic curiosities such as this one) but the "open letter to the hobbyists" still stands :) Release the Windows source code then we are talking.
Smalltalker-80 33 minutes ago [-]
In 1979, I made a program called VisiBase in this BASIC.
It's a visual database modeled after VisiCalc.
That won me a joystick in at a competition by the local computer store. :-)
Still have the source, that works in an Apple 2 emulator. It's 13 K in ASCII (untokenized).
rhdunn 45 minutes ago [-]
Ben Eater's 6502 series [1] uses MSBASIC for programming along with WozMon as the terminal interface.
Maybe Apple can finally release MacBasic now that Microsoft can no longer stop licensing their Basic to the Apple II family.
qingcharles 36 minutes ago [-]
Sadly nothing in Scott's blog post about how they obtained the source. Was it still in Microsoft's archives? Did they happen upon some tractor-feed print-outs they had to type in by hand?
chihuahua 19 minutes ago [-]
It would also be interesting why it was open-sourced now. I assume if they had done the same last year, the resulting loss of revenue would not have destroyed the plucky little $3T upstart.
bdcravens 19 minutes ago [-]
I assume today typing in by hand is no longer needed, with text parsing from images being table stakes for LLMs.
amichail 23 minutes ago [-]
Do you think computing history would have been much different if Microsoft made a 6502 Pascal interpreter instead?
xxs 20 minutes ago [-]
Pascal is a lot broader language and won't fit in sub 16KB of ROM (even if you exclude monitor [call-151])
amichail 7 minutes ago [-]
Maybe they could have implemented a useful subset of Pascal.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLowKtXNTBypFbtuVMUVXN...